I used to know this

Here’s a fact I recognized a long time ago and then forgot.

Antivaxxers are OCD.

The Public “Health” demons are also OCD.

This explains one peculiar twist in the current fake “debates”.

Antivax is a more natural and less contrived outcome of OCD. The provax position was imposed in 2020 by the ALL OR NOTHING digitalized positions of modern times.

OCD types hate ANY impurity, and especially hate it when the government forces you to touch or ingest impurities. In the ’50s, OCDs were agitated about both fluoridation and vaccines, as seen in this item from Aberree in ’57:

At that time, the publicly visible antis were mainly religious and “right-wing”, made famous by the general in Dr Strangelove.

In the ’60s the tendency switched sides, aided by environmentalism. Gaians are also OCD. Hippies joined the Christians on the anti-pollution bandwagon. Nixon picked it up and turned OCD into another government force. All productive activity must be shut down or shipped to China, because all productive activity pollutes in one way or another. Nixon was not OCD; he simply grabbed the wave and redirected it to enrich the rich and kill the poor.

= = = = =

After 1970, antivax and antifluoride were mainly hippie attitudes, and this was STILL true in 2020. Seattle and Portland were, and still are, centers of antivax agitation.

Now we have a peculiar situation. Deepstate has generated two “sides” as usual. Both of them are arguing about vax, which is NOT the most lethal aspect of the holocaust. Vax may be marginally helpful. Lockdowns and ballgags and distancing are the killers.

THE TWO “SIDES” ARE NOT ARGUING ABOUT BALLGAGS OR LOCKDOWNS. Both are perfectly okay with strangling and disemploying the poor. Both are OCD. The antivax side is led by RFK Jr, who is still a leader in the Gaian movement. He’s consistently OCD, consistently pro-banker, consistently anti-worker.

The provax side is inconsistent about vax, but ferociously holocaustally consistent about all the other murder weapons.

Antimaskers and antidistancers and antiluciters are the exact opposite of OCD, and they are only weakly represented in the “debates”. Nobody is even arguing about lucite.**

Polistra is watching the two “sides” agitate. She’s measuring their purity with her trusty GenRad OCD meter. Both sides register the same precise (of course) reading of 571.49315209 GigaKrauts. Both are fully “protected” against witchcraft.

= = = = =

**Footnote: Lucite really deserves more attention. Even the stupidest and least informed activist can’t POSSIBLY believe that a lucite barrier would slow down a microscopic pathogen. The lucite was OBVIOUSLY designed to protect store clerks and bus drivers from enraged HUMANS. Mecher’s gang knew that they were creating a TOTAL WAR AGAINST CIVILIZATION AND LIFE, so they needed to shield their frontline demonic conscripts from attacks by HUMANS.

Well, that’s interesting.

I just got a bitcoin ransom threat via email. Immediately reported it to IC3 and FTC. Obviously didn’t reply or pay.

Apparently this type of threat is familiar and known to be false. Several commenters on the FTC blog pasted the text of the threat, which was exactly the same as the one I received except for the amount.

The hacker showed off the password I use for WordPress. Yesterday I noticed a “viewer” in India, and the ransom email is written in India syntax. Might be correlated, might not. Immediately changed the password, though WP might not be the source.

I know the threat is fake because the hacker claims to have a video that couldn’t exist. I haven’t visited any porn sites, and I don’t have a webcam or any other camera connected to my computer. (Many of the FTC commenters said the same thing.)

The hacker also claims to have a keylogger, which is possible but unlikely. AVG has been stopping such things for many years, and a scan just now finds nothing.

So he might be able to send something to “all my contacts”, but the something couldn’t be the video he claims to have.

Thanks to FTC for writing a clear and non-bureaucratic article. None of the usual automatic lawyerly alarm. (Every threat is equally urgent and serious!!!!!) Instead, FTC says that this particular threat is strictly empty, and you CAN and SHOULD ignore it. For ten years I’ve been bitching that we no longer instruct people about scams. FTC’s blog is doing an outstanding job, even if the media aren’t doing their part.

= = = = =

Three days later: Nothing has happened.  No outraged feedback from my “contacts”.  As FTC said, the threat is a complete fake.