I’m tired and disgusted with the takeover of the “virus” rebels by the anti-vaxers, led by obvious hoaxer RFK Jr. They have completely memoryholed the strangulation and starvation and forced imprisonment of the entire world. They focus solely on side-effects of vax, which apparently happen to some people but not all.
Vax is a traditional part of public health, and can be life-saving for some diseases.
Imprisonment and strangulation and starvation and isolation and riots are traditional parts of WAR, and are always meant to KILL.
In this situation the antivaxers are building a cult around some side-effects of a few pokes, while totally ignoring the total destruction of civilization by the lockdowns and lucite and muzzles.
Many of them are fighting about the origins of the “virus”. Litigating details and characteristics of an entity leads you to accept the existence and importance of the entity. You’re asking the wrong question.
Back in 2019, before the “virus”, I was trying to sort out the signs of AP and color revolutions. I still think this is about right.
= = = = = START REPRINT:
I was fooled too many times by “color revolutions”, so I tried to pin down the Soros Signs. It comes down to three criteria. None are absolute, but taken together they form a pretty good shibboleth.
Number 3 is the clincher.
1. If the protest is covered heavily and steadily by Sorosian media, it’s Soros. By comparison, the Yellowvests have been largely ignored.
2. If the protesters are in a country that is doing pretty well, or a section of a country that is prosperous compared to the rest, it’s Soros. Catalunya and Hong Kong are comparatively prosperous. The Yellowvests represent poor parts of France.
3. If the protesters are fighting over an obscure issue that doesn’t affect their real lives, it’s Soros. Obscure issues = the name of Macedonia or an extradition law or “global warming”. The Yellowvests were fighting over taxes that ruined their already precarious livelihood.
= = = = = END REPRINT.
Polistra's Mill 