BlackVault has a new FOIA find from NSA. It’s a short report for internal use, dealing with NSA’s terrorist detection abilities in the ’70s. Only a few redactions, which don’t affect the meaning.
The writer sounds like a true professional trying to maintain objectivity in a situation (2002) when objectivity about terrorists was no longer wanted. Nice contrast to the “philosophers” who eagerly join the latest NAZI fashion, turning their full skill set toward destroying objectivity.
= = = = = START QUOTE:
As far back as the late 19th century, terrorism has been the tool used by many national, ethnic, political, or religious groups or movements to further their aims . Historical examples include the Irish Republican Army (known once as the Irish Republican Brotherhood), the Serbian Black Hand, and the Zionist Irgun Zvai Leumi, and a variety of anarchist groups. However, there is a problem of perception. No doubt that many movements have committed acts that can be interpreted as “terrorist.” More often, though, criteria, such as politics , propaganda, and ethnic or religious sympathies, were more important when it came to labeling a group terrorist.
= = = = = END QUOTE.
In other words, we can’t describe the Zionists as terrorists now.
The report also indicates a possible reason why we decided to buy and manipulate Osama in 1980.
= = = = = START QUOTE:
In 1976 a new organization, G11, the Synthesis Reporting Division, started publishing a weekly Summary of International Terrorist Activity (SITA). This reporting vehicle culled all G Group reports for items dealing with terrorist activity. The SITA continued into the early 1990s. Interestingly, the SITA excluded terrorist tactics used by [REDACTED] liberation movements It also excluded [REDACTED]. From the SITA series, an interesting trend in terrorist activity in the later years of the 1970s was that many terrorist acts were directed against so-called moderate Arab countries [REDACTED]. These attacks were carried out by terrorists who, in turn, were backed by the more radical regimes [REDACTED].
= = = = = END QUOTE.
That’s Osama. Working against the softer Muslim countries, sponsored by Saudi. Many of the softer (Turkic) Muslim countries were already part of the USSR, and others were being pulled in that direction. At that time Afghanistan was soft Muslim and strongly pulled by a Soviet-owned government. With the help of Osama, we remade Afghanistan in the Saudi radical model.
What happened in 2001 is still unclear. Based on Osama’s writings, I might guess that he got tired of being yanked around and betrayed by our Deepstate, and decided to go for maximum revenge. I don’t know what he was hoping to accomplish. Maybe he was just PISSED OFF.
Polistra's Mill 