What we lost, part 54386738957857834579

Yet another example of what we lost when the NYC tax evaders broke out of the FUNCTIONING British system in 1776.

= = = = = START QUOTE:

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough admitted last week that he and his wife, co-host Mika Brzezinski, often talk with democrats and other politicos — and “every discussion” about Biden included “anxiety” about his age. “When I say every discussion, I don’t mean 99% of the discussion — every discussion,” Scarborough emphasized.

In other words, democrats know. They just don’t know what to do about it.

= = = = = END QUOTE.

In the parliamentary system, a party DOES know what to do about it. Britain treats parties as corporations with a board of directors and a CEO. When the prime minister fails to fulfill the purposes of the majority party, the board fires him. This technique is not obsolete or vestigial; it’s happened a half dozen times in the last decade. It doesn’t require fake “judicial” charges and it doesn’t place a permanent stigma on the failed leader. He stays in Parliament and remains influential. Leaders are more likely to do crazy things when they know that removal means banishment or imprisonment.

The NYC tax evaders eliminated parties because they wanted total permanent control over the executive. The parties continued anyway, but without any meaningful power. Parties fuss and fight in Congress. They make noise to attract campaign funds. That’s all. The executive and “courts” are always firmly under the thumb of the NYC tax evaders, who now include the SF tax evaders.