No snappy conclusions

Tiffany gives a short report on Sammy’s actual testimony. After many years of conquering everyone he wants to conquer, many years of confidently promising the world and delivering shit, he ends up mumbling a hundred versions of “I don’t remember”.

I can’t think of any snappy conclusions based on Professional Criminal personality traits. This is just weird.

Bureaucrats always answer this way when faced with hostile questions. Bureaucrats apply the technique constantly and permanently. The know-nothing technique doesn’t convince anyone, but it does ultimately wear down the questioner if you do it every time. Sammy is starting it way too late.

If nothing else, Sammy is giving us the best-ever advertisement for lawyers.

Lawyers have a job. A competent lawyer will guide you toward the least harmful result, whether it’s an innocent verdict or a reduced sentence. Sammy has the BEST lawyers in the world and his parents are paying them millions. He’s doing everything possible, plus a thousand things nobody ever thought possible!!!, to defeat and devalue his own lawyers.

He’s conquering the wrong side.

Later thought: Maybe this does fit the Pro Criminal type. The Pro Criminal must do everything the dishonest way, must cheat everyone he deals with. After the arrest he no longer has employees and investors and customers to cheat. He’s only dealing with his lawyers, so he cheats them.