The antivaxers are working for Bush and Mecher and Fauci. They’re all on the same side, seeking the same goal of eliminating normal medicine and eliminating immunity.
Headline from one of the obviously fake antivaxers:
Near 0 deaths per year from MMR in the US over the last 6 years. So why do we REQUIRE kids to get the measles jab?
Real scientific answer: Because 0 deaths proves the vaccine works.
When you let up on a solution that works, the problem will return. This has happened in other countries where vaxes stopped, sometimes for highly understandable reasons.
Vaccines are part of real medicine. They’ve been used for 500 years in Turkey, and in “western” medicine for 200 years. Vaccines work perfectly against certain types of virus.
Vaccines have never worked well against “flu” and related respiratory viruses. Before 2020 real medicine recognized this fact and considered vax to be optional and marginal for these diseases.
This particular antivaxer is a rich stock trader. He’s playing the classic short game, stirring up public outrage against a stock to drive its value down.
Real opponents should oppose the EVIL parts of 2020, the “measures” that are traditionally part of military torture and psychopathic mass murder. Most of the activists are now concentrating solely on vaxes, helping Bush and Mecher to eliminate immunity and health. This is not Machiavellian controlled opposition, this is assisting the holocaust.
= = = = =
Sidenote: Back in the ’90s when hardass policing had cut down crime in big cities, media constantly fed us headlines with the same bad logic as this one.
“Police continue no-knock searches despite reduced crime”.
The no-knock searches and similar tactics were reducing crime. After the Libertarians got their way, police stopped doing their job and crime rebounded.
= = = = =
Meta-sidenote: I thought I had written about those police headlines before, but couldn’t find it in earlier years of the blog. I did find (as usual) lots of items from my neocon period when I was 100% convinced of one side and unwilling to write about the problems and contradictions within the side. Now I try to avoid ‘digital’ side-taking, try hard to see the bad aspects of my favored side. Undoubtedly still wrong part of the time.
