What could they do?

Last week I asked: Who benefits from the overdose genocide? At that time I couldn’t see any obvious money gains.

New thought:

There is one beneficiary. City governments are receiving federal aid to keep the genocide running. The devil “mayor” made this clear when she “declared an emergency”, which is another name for requesting a federal grant.

If the feds stopped providing grants for genocide, the benefit would stop, and the resulting loss of revenue would force a rethink.

Along with dropping the subsidy for genocide, could the feds take a more positive step? A bit of history helps.

The “inmate rights” movement eliminated previous NON-CRIMINAL methods of forcing treatment for drugs and other NON-CRIMINAL but undesirable behaviors.

Involuntary commitment worked.

When involuntary commitment is unavailable because of “rights”, there are only two choices. Criminalize the behavior, turning the sufferer into a permanent pariah, or just let the sufferer die. We’ve been doing both, and both are disastrous.

A federal fix would start with restoring involuntary commitment. At the same time, federal grants would be turned toward equipping NON-CRIMINAL confinement facilities instead of keeping the Narcan and endless “rescues” running.

On the larger scale, a ferocious new INDUSTRIAL POLICY would eliminate the social pain that leads to overdoses. Perform a System Reset to 1939. Go back to FDR. Delete everything that was added after 1939 and restore every law and agency and policy created by FDR.