Tried to read an account of today’s Supreme ruling on a college DEI policy. It seems to deny an appeal of a blocking of a ruling that appealed another ruling that blocked another ruling. Lawyer types on Quora understood it quickly and drew conclusions about it.
I can’t begin to decipher this sort of SHITTY PHILOSOPHY.
It’s certainly possible to construct an equally shitty program. Something like this in Python:
a = True
b = not(not(not(not(not(a)))))
print b
When I run this it prints False. I could add more not() layers to the onion, and get alternating True and False, but why bother? One negation is enough.
Polistra's Mill 