Tag: Fairness Doctrine
-
Fine. When will you start?
Yet another survey finds the public no longer trusts “journalists”. This one was done by something called the Reuters Institute, which is apparently not quite the same thing as the dying Reuters “news” agency. It polled US, UK, Brazil and India, and found the same distrust in the first three, while India still trusts its…
-
Fun to watch
Journalists incapable of thinking, part 4368549678578758347854378. A “journalist” monster pleaded for public support so they can continue smashing and torturing the public. The public uniformly and unanimously responded FUCK YOU. = = = = = In fairness, most of the “independents” are no better. The Trump cult and the Biden cult are equivalent. Outside of…
-
Both right
Pointless rant, triggered by dueling headlines. Fox: Leftist media peddles another anti-Trump hoax MSNBC: Far-right media peddles another anti-Biden hoax They’re both right. Media peddles hoaxes and lies. Nothing else. That’s the whole story. The alleged “independents” are no better. Taibbi peddles information “leaked” by Deepstate, which has carefully edited what it “leaks”. Taibbi seems…
-
Bloomberg continues to amaze
Bloomberg continues to amaze. In this piece they conclude that Congress is banning Tiktok because Congress wants to block ordinary Americans from talking with each other, and because Congress wants to ruin small businesses so Facebook and Google can own the country. Bloomberg thinks the “law” will probably fail in the courts, but it will…
-
Gangster all the way
I’m coming to appreciate Bloomberg podcasts as the least divisive available source, and the closest to the Fairness Doctrine. The “independents” are mostly either pure DNC cult or pure Trump cult. In this one short podcast Bloomberg discusses the idiotic Tiktok ban rationally, pointing out that both parties are relying heavily on Tiktok for campaign…
-
How do these myths start?
Compact has a good article on Trudeau’s absolute tyranny, which was aided AS ALWAYS by the media. Compact’s writers grasp HARDASS REALITY better than most, which is why I pay for a subscription. I won’t pay anyone who can’t see beyond the standard myths. In this article one of the standard myths creeps in, perhaps…
-
Pew does FD
Pew continues to amaze. Uniquely among big organizations, their writing passes the Fairness Doctrine test every time. It’s NOT HARD to write objectively. You have to know which words and phrases are dog whistles for R or cat whistles for D; and then simply avoid those words and phrases. Example from their announcement of a…
-
Murphy for journalism
Undoubtedly a stupid idea, but haven’t heard it anywhere else. I tried to give Newsweek a chance. I know how real fairness sounds from long experience with old radio. Newsweek failed the test quickly and decisively. In real production of cars or soap or software, real companies hire beta testers to wring out the bugs…
-
Somebody gets it! /// Edit: Nope.
Finally somebody else recognizes the crucial importance of the Fairness Doctrine! I’ve been railing on this since 2007, and I’ve never seen a correct understanding of the topic let alone an appreciation. From Newsweek’s editor: = = = = = START QUOTE: In the post-Fairness Doctrine era, we have witnessed an unprecedented polarization of American…
-
Meta-trust
I noticed somebody citing a poll on trusted institutions by the Edelman outfit. Looked and quickly realized the “poll” was a pusher. It was telling businesses that they need to be strictly DNC if they want to be trusted. More “climate”, more “diversity”, more “virus”, more “science”. This obviously won’t work. Taking a side is…
-
Depends on what you offer
There’s a lot of bitching lately about ‘audience capture’, meaning that the newspaper or broadcaster is forced to keep pleasing only Democrats or only Repooflicans. The bitchers are blaming the audience, ordering us to pay for stuff we don’t want in order to prevent the broadcasters from being ‘captured’. Wrong. Capture is permanent, inevitable and…
-
Crucial article.
This piece by Nathan Pinkoski in Compact may be the most important article of the year. More than justifies the price of the subscription! He explains what REALLY happened in 1968. The conventional account is intentionally wrong about LBJ, Nixon and Wallace. I was deeply involved in this shit as a hippie idiot, and Pinkoski’s…
-
Reprinting the first realization
I figured out the real purpose of “free speech” in 1978 and wrote about it here in 2008. = = = = = START REPRINT: The notion that civilization requires a certain degree of strictness is relatively undiscussed today. American commentators on both sides insist on touting Freedom, which is a delusion. It ain’t Freedom…
-
New thought along the same old line
Even pollsters now agree that debate doesn’t affect beliefs. Despite this nearly universal understanding, advocates and activists continue to push for “open debate” and “free speech”. They insist “the best answer to bad speech is good speech”. What really changes minds is EXPERIENCE. New thought: When was I able to change my mind about imperialism,…
-
More doubledays
Continuing the theme of opposite-purpose Days. Today is Dimpled Chad Day. The tied Florida “election” was declared tied on Jan 4, 2001, and then the Supremes snatched up the authority that should have belonged to Congress by the obsolete pointless “constitution”, and gave us Bush and infinite war and TARP and ZIRP and “virus” holocausts.…
Polistra's Mill 