At the moment, text-generating AI does a nearly perfect job of expressing views that can be found via Google and Wikipedia.
I’ve seen some attempts to generate “opposition” views, and they always miss the mark in the same way that Youtube’s Suggested misses the mark. Suggested has picked up the fact that I like old humorous TV and non-DNC political views. Suggested feeds me Jay Leno and Trump. Both dead wrong.
This absent area gives an advantage to human writers who derive their thoughts from experience and actual truth. Google has been shadowbanning truth for a long time, and elites have been banning experience and skills and muscle memory (“anecdotal data”) for centuries. Experience and truth have zero value, and are grossly unrepresented in online searches.
The artistic side of AI leaves a similar boutique gap for experience and muscle senses. At the moment AI clearly doesn’t understand how things work, so it draws physically impossible wheels and doors and fingers. This leaves room for animators who specialize in how things work. (Ahem.)
Both of these lacunae will undoubtedly be filled sooner or later, but at the moment ’boutiquers’ should take advantage.
Polistra's Mill 