Good question from Sailer

Sailer asks a damn good question:

= = = = = START QUOTE:

The massive deinstitutionalization of the 1960s–1980s is now widely considered a blunder, but why did it seem like a good idea at the time? We need to consider why progressive reformers in the English-speaking world turned as fervently against lunatic asylums in the 1970s as their forebears had become enthusiastic for them in the middle of the 19th century.

The movement to construct massive stone or brick buildings in calm rural settings to shelter the mentally troubled began in Britain among Quaker humanitarians around 1800. New England Unitarian reformer Dorothea Dix brought it to the USA in the 1840s.

= = = = = END QUOTE.

It seemed like a good idea because we’ve been permanently crazed by the vicious lies of “equality” and “rights”.

I remember that period. Friends and parents were agitating for “inmate rights”, applied to prisons and insane asylums. I knew they were wrong about prisons. There’s an extremely good reason to keep professional criminals in prison. I wasn’t sure about asylums, but the same principle seemed to apply there.

Later I saw the results of the “rights” in Norman, where inmates of Central State Hospital were wandering the streets, semi-functional, unable to cut loose from the institution that provided their Haldol.

Careful scholars have exposed the lie about asylums. The old asylums provided USEFUL WORK in a rural environment, relinking the patients to firm natural reality. IT WORKED. Most patients got better in a few months and didn’t revert. Modern asylums use drugs to keep patients addicted to extortion.

Low-IQ people are a separate story. They’re perfectly normal, and in rural situations or small towns with strong cultures they did just fine. Their talent is ideal for repetitive industrial work, which used to be well-paid. Low-IQ people have been MADE abnormal by changing the baseline. Tech tyrants and environmentalists and outsourcers have killed small towns and family farms and industrial work. Only Oriental-style math IQ is acceptable now.

Behind the lie of “rights”, why do demons want to free both the criminals and the crazies? That’s EASY. Demons want maximum chaos and harm and crime and riots and wars and lunacy. Demons need to watch ordinary people die in maximum misery.

The French demons of 1789 formalized “rights” with the help of the demonic Thomas Paine, and also originated the technique of opening the Bastille to maximize crime.