I stopped following Kirn regularly after he seemed to be drifting toward the convergence that comes with fame. He’s always an astute observer when his paycheck doesn’t interfere.
He’s been reading up on UFOs lately and reached the same conclusion that I did:
= = = = = START KIRN:
I’ve reached a tentative but strong conclusion on the UFO stuff.
It’s us, I think.
We had a strange dilemma after WW11. We developed some amazing tech with our Paperclip-assisted, Manhattan Project-fortified aerospace industry. To intimidate, we needed the enemy to have a sense of it, but to conceal the specifics it had to be a vague, unreliable, shifting sense. It still goes on.
= = = = = END KIRN.
After listening to old radio shows and reading several books written from different angles, I reached the same conclusion. Rational logic guarantees that alien intelligences must exist somewhere. But there’s NO good evidence that reported UFOs use technology we couldn’t achieve or hadn’t already achieved, and the behavior of the “alien craft” doesn’t make sense for a vastly superior tribe attempting to spy on us. If they were good enough to get here, they’d be able to hide their existence without any loopholes. Good spies are NEVER visible.
My conclusion was strongly influenced by two previous experiences.
(1) As an idiot neocon I was enamored of the Ground Observers Corps, and wished we would reactivate it to shoot down those horrible RadicalIslamicTerrorists who were always trying to invade us. Later, after kicking the neocon habit, I reverted to my previous EXPERIENCE-BASED knowledge that all “subversives” and “terrorists” are FBI. Others had unearthed enough documents to prove that the 1950s “enemy aircraft” were ours. Both phenomena were us. The observers were serving as Murphy for our newly developed stealth tech. If GOC could see it, the tech needed more work. The UFO campaign was happening at the same time and had the same flavor, with teams organized by the government.
(2) When I was doing speech research in the 80s, I was keeping track of parallel developments in the field, as any competent researcher does. I realized that NSA was WAY ahead of everything we were doing. In some cases NSA was using the academic side as an open beta team, watching our developments to see if we were verifying their work. This was, after all, the original purpose of NSA’s web.
Combining those two experiences, it’s clear that Deepstate is always WAY ahead of all publicly available tech, and Deepstate likes to organize teams of outsiders (both “with” and “against” Deepstate) as unpaid verifiers.
Murphiavelli?
Polistra's Mill 